Cutting Process of Polypropylene Staple Fiber and Its Effect on Carding
Many non‑woven manufacturers focus on denier, crimp and breaking strength when purchasing Polypropylene staple fiber, yet overlook morphological differences caused by cutting procedure. Polypropylene staple fiber made from identical raw materials and nominal specifications may produce excessive neps, roller wrapping and web holes during high‑speed carding due to poor cutting quality including over‑length fiber, uncut connected filaments and rough cut‑edges, even if lab test reports are qualified.
Over‑length fiber is a typical cutting defect. Worn blades and improper blade gap generate fibers far longer than target size. Once fed into carding machine, over‑length fibers wind around cylinders and rollers and cause frequent shutdown for cleaning. They also pull adjacent normal fibers and produce large amounts of secondary neps. Connected filaments refer to multi‑filament bundles which fail to be fully separated. They cannot be split into single fibers after opening and remain inside fiber web as hard surface defects on non‑woven fabrics.
Cut‑edge condition also affects processing performance. Dull blades squeeze and tear fibers instead of shearing neatly and leave burr‑like ends. Abnormal friction increases fiber entanglement and agglomeration during carding. For spun‑lace and high‑speed needling production lines, stricter tolerance for cutting uniformity is required, since minor cutting defects will evolve into batch‑wise fabric blemishes.
Cutting parameters shall match downstream processes. Wet‑laid and air‑laid technologies demand tighter length dispersion control compared with conventional needling. Hubei Botao Synthetic Fiber Co., LTD manages blade replacement cycle and roller clearance during Polypropylene staple fiber production to reduce over‑length fiber and connected filaments, fitting non‑woven lines for automotive interior, geotextile and filter material.
Besides routine physical‑chemical tests, downstream purchasers are suggested to sample and inspect cut‑edge and length distribution, and run simulated carding trial. Evaluate real‑world processing performance comprehensively to avoid mass‑production risks induced by cutting defects.